Identify the receiving route
Name the responsible production team, intended material/process and requested output role. The designer needs the relevant approved requirements, not a promise that a generic surface works with any machine. If the receiving route changes, consider which earlier assumptions no longer apply.
exocad documents material configurations for dentalshare, including configuration supplied by a manufacturing contact. That capability illustrates why the receiving workflow matters; it does not establish that any preset is correct for a case or that Pristine maintains a particular production integration.
Keep a requirement reference record
| Field | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Process and material | Identify the actual approved receiving workflow. |
| Instruction source | Name the current manufacturer/process document or approved receiving requirement. |
| Version or date | Make the requirement used for this design traceable. |
| Design implication | State which feature or output the receiving team asks to review. |
| Exception owner | Identify who resolves a conflict or changed process. |
Do not turn this record into a table of universal numerical settings. Thickness, connector, component and production requirements depend on the approved indication and actual instruction source.
Distinguish CAD review from CAM preparation
The design stage and downstream production preparation can have separate responsibilities. Ask who checks the exported geometry, who prepares the receiving production job and who authorizes release. A software status should not silently combine those decisions.
Illustrative conflict: a receiving process changes after the design was reviewed under a different requirement set. Identify the changed process and ask which checks need to be repeated before the old output is reused. The guide does not prescribe machine settings or a fabrication remedy.
Use a bounded release statement
A delivery can say that the listed outputs were prepared for the named receiving route and remain subject to its acceptance. The responsible team should record the actual checks completed and any holds. Avoid claiming universal manufacturability from a render or file extension.
Keep the requirement record with the brief and release manifest. If a new instruction supersedes an earlier source, update the affected case record and identify dependent designs rather than changing defaults without documenting the scope.
Source notes
Primary documentation checked October 6, 2026. Software details describe the cited product documentation; the handoff frameworks and illustrative examples are original editorial guidance. Confirm current version and account requirements with the publisher.
Prepared by Pristine Dental Design · October 6, 2026. Guidance for professional case communication and review. Actual prescriptions, manufacturer requirements and receiving-team approvals govern design and production.