SOFTWARE WORKFLOWS

Remote Dental CAD Collaboration: A Versioned Case Workflow

A clear case identifier and a current brief can prevent design work from following outdated instructions. This collaboration model is useful when lab staff, clinicians and remote designers contribute to the same case.

Agree one case identifier

Use an identifier across the prescription, record transfer and returned files. Avoid patient names in general business correspondence where an internal identifier will do. Agree an appropriate route for actual case records before transfer.

Name the current record set

Label scans and references by purpose and version. State which files replace previous records. If a bite or reference changes, identify the affected design stage so the team can assess what needs review again.

Consolidate revision instructions

Combine requested changes into one current note and include marked views when useful. Identify unit, view and desired result. Conflicting comments from different people require a decision from the approval owner rather than interpretation by the designer.

Define approval ownership

Identify who can clarify the prescription, approve setup and release manufacturing files. These may be different people. A setup approval should specify the stage and version, so it is not mistaken for blanket acceptance of later outputs.

Carry learning into repeat work

Keep a versioned preference record for software, materials and accepted settings. Note exceptions alongside the case instead of overwriting the general default. Update the record when the lab changes its production workflow.

Prepared by Pristine Dental Design · October 6, 2026. Workflow guidance for dental professionals. Case-specific instructions and receiving-team approval govern actual design and production.

A DEFINED FIRST STEP

Discuss the work.
Define the handoff.

One paid test case, quoted to scope. Delivery target and revision terms agreed before work starts.

Request a test-case quote

Local vs Remote-Hosted Dental CAD: Define the Host and Client

Choose a practice collaboration route by the required task

Agree whether the remote designer is commenting on a view, designing from exported records, editing a native project or returning manufacturing output. Those tasks require different evidence and permissions. Record the exact practice product, installed release, modules and intended receiving application before choosing a transfer route.

ChairsideCAD's public page describes dentalshare communication with labs and STL design export. TRIOS Design Studio describes Produce integrated-device delivery and STL Save to folder. Neither public statement proves native-project editability in a different product, a particular remote-access license or a supported Pristine integration.

Hypothetical example: a practice asks for a change to an existing design but sends only a production mesh. Clarify whether the deliverable is review feedback, a derivative mesh or a native editable revision. If native editing is required, verify the specific native-package route, receiving version and permissions before promising it.

Run an authorized pilot with internal test references: inventory sent records, observe receiving behavior, perform the agreed limited task and return a labelled revision. Record who owns corrections and approval. Do not include credentials in the worksheet or grant access through an unapproved shared account.

Original review worksheet
Record or decisionEvidence to record
View/reviewWhat can be seen; feedback scope; no implied native edit capability.
Exported recordsManifest/appearance/context audit; license; receiving observations.
Native editExact package format and release; entitlement; authorized access; observed edit/return test.
Returned outputRole and revision; dependent changes; reviewer; production release remains separate.

Download the blank review worksheet (CSV)

Louie validation required — unverified locally. Actual installed software behavior, record dependencies, acceptance and Pristine compatibility require authorized configuration-specific validation. Hypothetical examples do not authorize clinical decisions, mesh repair or manufacturing release.

Official sources checked October 6, 2026; installed-release applicability remains pending.

Continue with Accepting a Returned Native Dental CAD Project; Prepare a Remote CAD Collaboration Session.